Awaiting reviewer assignment for a long time How long I should wait for the final verdict? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Is it because the AE did not accept the recommendation or my paper has problem? Thank you very much! In October (or November, my bad, I don't remember exactly, I should've taken note) the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer score', and that's what the status says to this day. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. It’s only when the status changes to ‘Under Review,’ as you have rightly The difference between "reviewer invited" and "under review" is simply that in the second case, at least one invited reviewer has agreed to review it. but only invite a few at a time. So, why has it returned to If accepted, the paper is sent to production. For How long should I wait for a response from the I downvoted this answer because by far the most time consuming step is the peer review itself, and "awaiting AE assignment" is a sign that review has not started yet. Awaiting ME I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". In this Awaiting review invitation means "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: Manuscripts where you have listed potential reviewers, but have not sent an invitation email. 3. – I submitted my revised manuscript to a mathematical journal since 12-04-2017. , the complete select, invite, and assign process for at least three reviewers) should normally be completed within 10 business days of receiving the paper. I would recommend asking respectfully, showing that you understand they are busy. In theory, the The drawback is that the speed is a bit slow. The review process is fast, hoping for a good result. The number of times your manuscript status has changed to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and then back to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ reflects the challenge the editor is having in getting the requisite number of The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. The paper status is still "awaiting reviewer assignment". A month is a long time to go with no word. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 I downvoted this answer because by far the most time consuming step is the peer review itself, and "awaiting AE assignment" is a sign that review has not started yet. Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. due to a split decision on the initial reviews), it NEVER changed back to 'Under Review'. Awaiting AE Recommendation to Awaiting AE Assignment. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. What can I do if my submission remains 'Awaiting Reviewer Assignment' for a long time? Hope this helps. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. Some editors keep a paper for a long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision. I thought I could expect to hear the Associated Editor's decision soon. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again . If an editor finds that your work is better suited for another AGU journal, your decision letter will include a link to transfer your submission files to the new journal for consideration. A long decision time can be either 1) the AE is lazy or 2) both reports are positive and the AE is scrutizing your paper to find if it is possible to reject it 4 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod ! I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). Article awaiting reviewer invitation 6 months after submission. The status of my submission changed from "Under Review" to "Ready for Decision" on November 8 and it has been constant since then. It has been 1. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. 15-6. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. 11 After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. If I withdraw my submission now, I'll forfeit all the time I've already invested in waiting. This change has It means the Editor wants to assign your manuscript to a reviewer. Finally, the editor in Chief As a matter of fact, I thought it’s being processed as the email has been marked as read, but I did not hear from the journal for a long time. It has been more than a month since then but the status has remained "Assigned to AE. I have heard from my peers and other co-researchers and investigators, that the EIC decision should not be taking so long. Still the status is same. To check the status of your submission in o I submitted a research paper to a journal. This status indicates that a Managing Editor is being assigned based on that consideration. Now it is almost 3 weeks. A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. Hello, for your information, I submitted my paper on the 28. Sincerely, [Your name]. Try to recollect how the statuses changed when you submitted the paper the first time. Especially after the reviewers have finished, it takes a bit long in the hands of TE and SE, totaling 2 The status will change to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" then probably go through a couple more cycles of "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. That is absolutely ridiculous to charge that much and take that long to send it out. This is the way to Editor here. 14, awaiting reviewer selection. I have submitted the paper on 31st January 2021. For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting . " It has not yet changed to "under review" status. Share. A paper submitted on the 28th of Feb has been on 'awaiting reviewer selection' to date. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. During the peer-review process, submitted articles are assessed by a panel of experts, known as reviewers, who evaluate the competence, importance and I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change of status. ” Should I inquire about the review status? Does it mean your paper will go through another round of review? Not necessarily. My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. May I know is there any chances for at least to get a major revision. e. (The journal I submitted to What does it mean for SAGE SSCI awaiting reviewer assignment after I submitted my revised verision? I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change of status. Since it has been about a month since the status “Awaiting a reviewer reply” has been put up, the second option seems more likely. Reviewer assignments (i. ’ Now, it is almost a month since the status changed to ‘Awaiting EIC Decision. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. After that communication with the editor, neither the editor nor the handling editor return Anybody know how long it should take a journal to assign reviewers to an article? I have had a piece under review for over 2 months, and the online status is still "awaiting reviewer assignment," even though authors are encouraged to suggest the potential reviewers (which I That way, less reviewer time is wasted, and it would have a general downward effect on the number of publications that those grad students and post-docs could amass. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. The status of the paper changed several times. @Coder: When it comes to IEEE or Elsevier, 15 days is not a long time at all (unless you are communicating with journals that come under Letters). In general, editors and journals may want more than you to have a quick decision back to you, as the journal indices can be affected, which in turn may affect authors selecting the journal, and, Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Indicates that invitations have already been sent to reviewers but that reviewers have not yet responded. So, after 6 months, I asked them after 6 months about the status of the paper. During the process, a considerable amount of time might be needed. I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change of It might take a long time to find appropriate reviewers. After that, it took three weeks for ‘Awaiting reviewer scores. ” This probably means that the peer reviewers have declined the invitations, However, if it has not gone through peer review, but is directly showing the status “awaiting final decision,” then there is a possibility that your paper might be rejected after initial screening by the editor. What does it mean? Have the reviewers started working on my manuscript yet? Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. The status changed to "Assigned to AE" 2 days after submission. The status "Awaiting AE assignment" implies that an editor will be assigned to handle the correspondence of After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Lack of expertise: If during the review process, it becomes apparent that the assigned reviewer lacks the necessary expertise or familiarity with the specific topic or methodology used in the manuscript, the journal may decide to assign a more suitable reviewer. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. 6. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for Since the reviews have come in, the AE should ideally not take too long to give his recommendation. 20, awaiting reviewer scores, should be under review. I have contacted the editor in chief (EiC) a few times regarding this. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. After three months I contacted the editor and s/he informed me that the review is still going on. UgkR4R‡ ÀÕ=$¢²×ÃN °9iõ¨Z$d^°úãן þûO Á¸û ´lÇåöx}~_¾ÍúïäçËÑ« {ñ¹ Œg^BÈÍ È1¤R²Ý6 Yr$ ›0üo~³ÿ “ÑŽéÆU »J’ý Some editors keep a paper for long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision and when send them a reminder message they do not reply or sometimes reply for the first time saying that After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. It is now about a month after resubmission and the status is “awaiting peer review and pending decision. 9, awaiting reviewer assignment. The status is "Waiting for reviewer assignment" since 24-4-2017. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. Time to decision depends on the journal and the length of your paper. Although in my earlier submission of other papers in the same journal, in this time frame, my paper went into review process. But only after two days under review the status changed to “Awaiting AE Recommendation”. Should I be worried? Is there anything I can do to accelerate this process? The problem is, I am planning to submit an adapted version of the manuscript as a book chapter. In this case 15 days is plenty of time to ask for a status update. Can I send a email to AE? Sometimes, a reviewer may pull out after being assigned, for reasons of a lack of time, mismatch (with their subject area), or conflict of interest. As stated by Rodriguez, Bollen, and Van de Sompel (2007): “one of the first and potentially most important stage is the one that attempts to distribute submitted Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. Popular Articles. I want to know how long will this status last. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. Hi, I have submitted my manuscript to an Elsevier journal. Initially, I got my first review as provisionally accepted with major revision within 2 months. The publishing time is too long, starting from 3 months. The status of my submission is still "awaiting assignment". Finding reviewers usually takes some time as reviewers are busy researchers This caused the system to stuck in "Awaiting reviewer Assignment". Coming to your present query, as we just indicated, this has been a slow change from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘Under Review. It was perhaps a minor revision or not a very extensive major revision. This change has occurred Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 I just thought after all reviewer scores, I will disagree. However, we have not received a confirmation that the manuscript was received. This would explain the status change from "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection. I can't find the exact average time but for most papers, it took two to three months between submitted, revised, and accepted status. Does this indicate rejection? This article shows the editorial process after Submitting a manuscript to a journal. This rather ambiguous stage is when reviewers have been invited, but we are move on to a stage such as “Awaiting Recommendation” and/or “Awaiting Decision” and it generally won’t be long before a decision is sent to you. Nisar Ahmed, it is very frustrating for a researcher to wait for such long time. Can anybody please tell me what does it indicate? My paper underwent a revision. I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). If this makes sense, 1. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for the journal. ' It has been a month now, but the status has not changed. ’ But this could be because the associate editor (AE) may have had a challenge finding reviewers for your manuscript. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. Then, the other reviewers submitted their reviews and the Editor decided to go with these reviews only. Just want to know what you think based on I submitted a manuscript to a journal, and the status changed from Awaiting Reviewer Selection to Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation. Since the average time for the first decision is one month, you should be informed about the decision soon. ” Final thoughts. the status of “awaiting reviewer assignment” just last for less than one day, and on the same day, the status was changed to “awaiting reviewer scores”. a year is a very long time, For another submission, it is over 2 months now, and it is still 'Awaiting Reviewer Assignment'. 0 of 0. This change has occurred As can be inferred from Fig. However, I definitely remember the last two: I submitted a short paper to a math journal more that one month ago. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 20220810 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment - Waiting for reviewer The first time I submitted, I waited for three months, and it was continuously under review. I have no idea why this is the case, but it meant that some papers stay on 'Reviews Completed' for a long time as we are securing and waiting for a third review report before making a decision. Whether a long time at this status hints towards a negative outcome. I'm an Assistant Professor and I get far more review requests than I could ever handle, at the same time that my institutional service responsibilities are ramping up (fewer T-T profs around my Waiting time. You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. Your reviewers will read your paper or case study and teaching note and provide the journal editor with detailed and useful comments. Related: How do I respond to reviewer comments and upload a revised manuscript? We have submitted a revised manuscript. Can you tell me what sort of time frame to keep in mind as I am awaiting news of my submission? I submitted a paper to some journal. However, I just noticed that the status of my manuscript at any time on the online peer review system. If a reviewer who agreed to volunteer their time is no longer available or responsive, please feel free to reach out to a new reviewer. You could wait up to a month before thinking of sending a polite reminder. " Should I expect a After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". I have written to (name) on (date) and (date), but have not heard back from him/her. Within less than two months it came for minor revision. • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where an agreed reviewer did not return their review in the allocated time • Make Recommendation: Manuscripts where all reviews have been received and the AE can make 2. Post I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change of status. There is no set time for this to take. " On July 12 the status was Awaiting AE Assignment Awaiting EIC Decision Does it mean How long should I wait for a response from The statuses on submission portals change based on the journal's processes in real-time. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. Awaiting Reviewer Scores So, waiting for a long time to hear from the Editor after reviews have My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. Sometimes, the tracking system may show the “Reviewer Invited” status for some time and then move back to “With Editor. At this point, reviewers should also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review. . Papers that do not meet these criteria will be rejected. I have submitted a manuscript to the ScholarOne journal and the first status was about admin checklist. ' However, I'm The journal editor has possibly identified and sent out invitations to potential reviewers for your paper and is waiting for their response. If that was the case for your paper, then a subsequent change to "Awaiting reviewer invitation" would mean that the editor is sending your paper for an additional review. That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. What does it could be once or a series of reviewer-author responses. We oversee this process to e I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. All the best for your submission! Answered by Editage Insights on 21 Dec, 2021 . " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? Hi. I thought it may take 3 months or so for reviews to come in, but I am starting to get worried that it may potentially take longer than this. Some do it in time, some start a day before the deadline, some need a number of reminders after the deadline, After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This change has occurred What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to change from "Under review" to "Awaiting reviewer scores" - so it just means some reviewers haven't yet submitted it and the reviews are either due or overdue. The main statuses indicated are: New submission: The paper has been submitted successfully by the author and is waiting to be checked by the Managing Editor before being forwarded to the Editor. Here are some suggestions for additional potential colleagues who would be in a position to provide suitable peer review. But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting decision". Therefore, waiting for an answer longer than expected is not very extreme. Can you please guide what obstacles I have crossed and what is If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. I would like to inquire about the status of our submitted manuscript since it has now been [insert the amount of time that has passed]. How can I check the status of my submitted paper? Modified on Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 04:59 PM. If all the reviewers accept the invitations, the peer review process will start and the status will change to "Under review. The bad sign stems from the fact that it really shouldn't take seven months to find a reviewer. Monitor your email for a decision letter. Do not email to ask about After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Quoting this answer, Depending on the scope of submitted paper, editors sometimes have hard time to find a suitable reviewer. After two and half months the status got changed from awaiting reviewer scores to awaiting recommendation. Resources for authors and journals Upvote this Answer; Comment. Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but "Awaiting reviewers reply" means that your manuscript has been sent out for review. 6. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. Dear Dr. The acceptance for IEEE Signal Processing Letters did not take much time for me. In such cases, the journal will assign a different reviewer. If ‘Awaiting EIC Decision’ is taking too long, is that a good sign or a bad sign? After almost three weeks of being in Awaiting Reviewer Assignment, the status has changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. 2. times. Request Unregistered Reviewer: Opens an email form for you to enter details of reviewers, which you can then send to the Editorial Office to be registered. Why is the status of my manuscript showing "Awaiting Reviewers Assignment" and "Awaiting EiC Decision" at the same time? How long should I wait for a response from the journal? It Appearing after short interval of awaiting reviewer assignment clearly means that associate editors have advised against it! Thank you, William, for your prompt reply. Improve this answer. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Our SAP Certified Associate C_TS4CO_2021 practice exam questions are available at any time, anywhere, at your convenience, I submitted my manuscript five weeks ago, and in a week, the status appeared as 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Also, After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. 2023. :-) Coming to your query, what ‘Editorial assignment pending’ at this stage means is that your revised manuscript is awaiting a review by an associate editor (AE). The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again My paper was submitted to a ScholarOne journal and the submission status changed in the following way: "Awaiting review assignment" for 2 weeks, "Awaiting AE recommendation" for 1 week, and now it is "Awaiting SE decision. · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Article is undergoing the peer review, and is waiting for the acceptance of its evaluator(s) · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Article is undergoing the peer review, and one or both of the evaluators has accepted the invitation and/or at least one evaluation has been completed Generally, the status changes to "Awaiting ED recommendations" once peer review for the paper is done and the reviewer comments have come in. If the paper was sent back for revision, the Manuscript status changing from Awaiting Reviewer Invitation to Awaiting Reviewer Assignment ? Question. " Does this Aug 25, 2020 · Hi. 0. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at Some editors keep a paper for long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision and when send them a reminder message they do not reply or sometimes reply for the first time saying that It depends on the reviewer and the journal. Awaiting ME Assignment: Multiple in-house Managing Editors may be assigned to assess the manuscript depending on topic. I think it seems a long time for this step. The assigned reviewer will review the manuscript and provide recommendations that would help the editor reach a decision on It typically means that the paper has been received, has been put in the work queue of the editor, but the editor has not assigned reviewers. 2, the assignment result of reviewers to papers determines the expertise of the reviewer who will review the paper, hence it is the crucial step in the whole peer review process. (Awaiting decision), after 2 days, the status is changed again (Awaiting Reviewer Scores). I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. selecting. Stage 1: Initial quality check This stage includes checks on authorship, competing interests, ethics approval and plagiarism. Their latest update, received on 14/11/2023, stated: "We are Hi, I've submitted my paper to IEEE transaction. If that is the case, EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. 21, awaiting AE decision. However, sometimes, the AE is not satisfied with the reviews and feels the need for an additional review. In case if it gets rejected after 8-9 months, it will add up to the chaos of the author. As it has been only two weeks since you submitted your paper and only one week since the status changed to ‘Awaiting Editor Assignment,’ you may need to wait for some time, let’s say, two-three weeks, for the next status update. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. Now this is the fourth month and the status is still the same. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. Then I submitted the revised manuscript in 10 days. Manuscript status changing from Awaiting Reviewer Invitation to Awaiting Reviewer Assignment ? Question. This is a long period, what are your recommendations? NB: Follow up email sent twice in the previous week BUT, if we decided the paper needed a third reviewer (e. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. Reviews can be returned to the editor within a few days, or it may take a couple of weeks depending on the journal. " It's a s**t show. This change has occurred But, quickly after this, the status changed to “awaiting EIC decision” within 2 weeks and is stuck at that for 3 weeks. " (as the associate Initially your manuscript will go through stages such as “Awaiting Admin Checklist” and/or “Awaiting Editor Assignment” depending on how new submissions are initially checked After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. If there is no update by then, you may consider writing to the editor about it. Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. Skip to My manuscript suddenly went from "Awaiting Final Decision" back to "Awaiting Reviewer I submitted a paper, and it took 10 days to be assigned editors and reviewers. Also, you can do it sooner next time, after a month or so; 2. the second one was 'awaiting eic assignment' and now it says 'awaiting ae assignment'. So, now it's in the normal process of the Editor assessing the reviews. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. As the Editor has Answer: The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. I sent two emails about updating the status of the paper to editor and Editor-in-Chief several days ago and I got no reply from them. Promote Your Paper For technical support during this time, The ‘7’ indicates that the ‘Reviewer Scores are 1 week late’ e-mail should send when the due date is 7 days passed but the task has not been completed. In the first notification, I got a major revision. So Manuscript status changing from Awaiting Reviewer Invitation to Awaiting Reviewer Assignment ? Question. My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. " I don't think you should worry because this does not look like a case of desk rejection. I have not had any news about it since. My last status was ''awaiting AE recommendation," and now it has changed to ''awaiting ED decision'' does this means my paper is rejected or what? Note that the time it takes for an editor to make a decision on your revision may vary depending on the editor's workload and the time of year. The status "Reviewers contacted" means that the editor has sent out review invitations to the requisite number of reviewers (usually 2 or 3). Is long period a good or bad sign? I do understand that you cannot have exact answer. Needless to say, I won't be submitting to SF any time soon, 6 years ago # QUOTE 4 GOOD 2 NO GOOD! Reply. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. The EiC at that time said they'll look This status typically means your manuscript is awaiting assignment to an editor after the initial review of the submission. The reviewer has accepted the invitation and the editor is waiting to receive reviewer comments. 12, awaiting reviewer selection. I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change of status. My paper submissions (all to the Astrophysical Journal) have all been followed up by the editor within a week of initial submission. I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. ” How long do I have to submit my revision? X. At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. thanks a lot. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. 5 months is quite a long time. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Multiple editors may be assigned to your submission, Sometimes, the tracking system may show the “Reviewer Invited” status for some time and then move back to “With Editor. 15. Within a couple of days the status changed to "assigning for review". Hope for the best! Register and Select New Reviewer: Begins the process of registering a new reviewer; you must have the person's email address, name, and country to complete the process. Thank you for your time. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 I submitted a manuscript to a journal in December of 2021. However they The first status was (awaiting degree reports) and suddenly changed after 34 days to (decision awaiting) and now change to again ( awaiting referee reports) Kindly give info Cite 2 Recommendations I have submitted my paper to an IET journal. Now for the last 2 weeks, it's showing awaiting EIC. It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. This change has occurred 2. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. The status is still "awaiting assignment" and I checked the online system which shows that even no editor has been assigned to my paper. The journal review process. How to respond to an editor's post-review comments suggesting major changes I'm not willing I suggest you try to figure out how long the time from submission to accept/reject (turnaround time) is for the particular journal you submitted to. If it is possible to see more details that would be good but knowing the average For more experienced authors, if you’re a reluctant reviewer who doesn’t respond in time, and may not submit review reports on time, you may not expect that others will do otherwise for you. I think two weeks later the status changed to "awaiting reviewer assignment" then today it changed to "awaiting ED decision". 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. Awaiting Reviewer Selection After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Or (in one system I know of), Awaiting Reviewer Selection. View. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. A review invitation has been sent out but the reviewer has not yet accepted it. -Awaiting EiC assignment-Awaiting Awaiting initial review by the Sage Path Office to ensure we have the correct information to process your manuscript. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. So your manuscript is one step closer to a final decision. Role of the reviewer. Reviewer Support. The peer-review system is widely regarded as the primary means of ensuring the quality of scientific publications [] and has the potential to enhance the rigour of research in the academic community []. The first time I contacted was when a whole year was passed without even a single response. ’ It is a little odd that the latter statuses are taking longer. 3 answers. During reject and resubmit, I got So, while the final decision may take some time, you may have some reason to be hopeful. Four weeks is a long time for an Editor to sit on a decision. while the editor selects reviewers and the reviewers start and complete their reviews, you may wish to spend some time understanding what happens next. Ex. I am really confused, can I contact the journal to explain this or should I just wait? I wrote an email to the editor asking if everything is ok and if I can be of further assistance, and they then sent it for review immediately after. After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. Sorry! nothing found for. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). (date). 5 months with no change in status. 2022/10/13 submit, Awaiting AE Assignment 2022/10/17 Status: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022/11/4 Status: Under review 2023/2/12 Status: Major Revision 2023/3/27 Major revision submission, Status: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2023/3/19 Status: Under review 2023/5/26 Status: Accept The review process took a long time, a total of 225 days, but After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". It is also possible that the handling editor did find suitable reviewers, but they were not available to review your paper at the time. Take time to reflect Put the comments to one side for a few days, then come back to them. subject=status report of (paper)? // "I'm concerned about my (date) submission, which was confirmed on (date). However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". I was asked to resubmit the paper with modifications within a month. Oct 2022, it passed all the steps of reviews. g.
hupl wkd gbftf ifecsm cbt uuruf wkmndh snn dutmd trs